West Bank

State of Palestine
West Bank Palestinian Authority
Palestinian Local Government
in the West Bank
Jenin
Qabatiya
Ya'bad
Yamun
JENIN
Tulkarm
TULKARM
TUBAS
Tubas
NABLUS
QALQILYA
Qalqilyah
SALFIT
Salfit
RAMALLAH AND AL-BIREH
al-Bireh
Beitunia
JERICHO
JERUSALEM
BETHLEHEM
HEBRON
Halhul
Yatta
Dura
ad-Dhahiriya

The West Bank (Arabic: الضفة الغربية‎, aḍ-Ḍiffä l-Ġarbīyä, Hebrew: הגדה המערבית‎, HaGadah HaMa'aravit)[1], also אזור יהודה והשומרון (Ezor Yehuda Ve-Ha-Shomron, especially in official documents)[2] is a landlocked territory[3] and is the eastern part of the Palestinian territories; on the west bank of the Jordan River in the Middle East. To the west, north, and south, the West Bank shares borders with the state of Israel. To the east, across the Jordan River, lies the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. The West Bank also contains a significant coastline along the western bank of the Dead Sea. Between 1967-1994, most of the West Bank has been under Israeli military administration (First under the name "West Bank" then, in the late 1970s, renamed "Judea and Samaria Area"). The Palestinian National Authority assumed some of the military administration's authorities since 1994 as an interim arrangement. The Eastern part of Jerusalem and its vicinity was effectively, though not officially, annexed by Israeli civilian law into the Jerusalem Municipality shortly after the war in June 1967.

Prior to the First World War, the area now known as the West Bank was under Ottoman rule as part of the province of Syria. At the 1920 San Remo conference, the victorious Allied powers allocated the area to the British Mandate of Palestine. Following World War II, United Nations passed the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181 (II) Future Government of Palestine which aimed to establish a two-state solution within Palestine. The territory known as the "West Bank" was originally part of the proposed Arab territories, but following the Arab-Israeli War this area was captured by Trans-Jordan (renamed Jordan in 1949). The name "West Bank" was proposed by the Jordanian authorities to describe the area west of Jordan River. The 1949 Armistice Agreements defined its interim boundary. From 1948 until 1967, the area was under Jordanian rule, and Jordan did not officially relinquish its claim to the area until 1988, ceding its territorial claims to the PLO and eventually stripping West Bank Palestinians of Jordanian citizenship [4][5]. Jordan's claim was never formally recognized by the international community, with the exception of the United Kingdom. The United States Department of State also recognized this extension of Jordanian sovereignty.[6][7][8] The West Bank was taken control of by Israel, during the Six-Day War in June, 1967. With the exception of East Jerusalem and the former Israeli - Jordanian no man's land, the West Bank was not annexed by Israel. Most of the residents are Arabs, although a large number of Israeli settlements have been built in the region since 1967. Close to 500,000 Israelis live in the West Bank settlements, annexed East Jerusalem and the former Israeli - Jordanian no man's land areas. Although international law (Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention) prohibits "transfers of the population of an occupying power to occupied territories", media outlets often interpret the law to incur a responsibility on the part of Israel's government to prevent Jews or non-Arab Israeli citizens from voluntarily residing in the West Bank, including cases where Israelis seek to restore Jewish communities destroyed by Arabs prior to Israel's statehood, such as in Hebron and Gush Etzion.[9][10][11]

The West Bank has a land area of 5,640  km2 (including East Jerusalem),[12] and 220 km2 water (the northwest quarter of the Dead Sea). Its population is 2,514,845 (June 2010)[13] according to the Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS). Other Palestinian ministries indicate that its Arab population, excluding East Jerusalem, is 1.5 million.

Contents

Origin of the name

West Bank

The region did not have a separate existence until 1948–1949, when it was defined by the Armistice Agreement of April 1949 between Israel and Jordan (until then known as Transjordan). The name "West Bank" was apparently first used by Jordanians, and has become the most common name used in English and some of the other Germanic languages. The term was used in order to differentiate 'the West bank of the River Jordan', namely the newly annexed territory; from the "East Bank" of this river (Transjordan), which today constitutes the present territory of the Kingdom of Jordan.

Cisjordan

The neo-Latin name Cisjordan or Cis-Jordan (literally "on this side of the [River] Jordan") is the usual name in the Romance languages and Hungarian. The analogous Transjordan has historically been used to designate the region now comprising the state of Jordan which lies on the "other side" of the Jordan River. In English, the name Cisjordan is also occasionally used to designate the entire region between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean, particularly in the historical context of the British Mandate and earlier times. The use of Cisjordan to refer to the smaller region discussed in this article, while common in scholarly fields including archaeology, is rare in general English usage; the name West Bank is standard usage for this geo-political entity. For the low-lying area immediately west of the Jordan, the name Jordan Valley is used instead.

History

1947-UN-Partition-Plan-1949-Armistice-Comparison.png

The territory now known as the West Bank was a part of the British Mandate of Palestine entrusted to the United Kingdom by the League of Nations after World War I. The terms of the Mandate called for the creation in Palestine of a Jewish national home without prejudicing the civil and religious rights of the non-Jewish population of Palestine.[14] During that time the area was called by the historic names of its two regions – Judea and Samaria.[15]

The current border of the West Bank was not a dividing line of any sort during the Mandate period, but rather the armistice line between the forces of the neighboring kingdom of Jordan and those of Israel at the close of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War. When the United Nations General Assembly voted in 1947 to partition Palestine into a Jewish State, an Arab State, and an internationally administered enclave of Jerusalem, a more broad region of the modern-day West Bank was assigned to the Arab State. The West Bank was controlled by Iraqi, Jordanian forces, and the IDF in the northern West Bank especially Tulkarm and Qalqilya were under full Israeli control at the end of the 1948 War. Jordan annexed the West Bank after the war, though this was only recognized by the UK.[8] The idea of an independent Palestinian state was not on the table. King Abdullah of Jordan was crowned King of Jerusalem and granted Palestinian Arabs in the West Bank and East Jerusalem Jordanian citizenship.[16]

During the 1950s, there was a significant influx of Palestinian refugees and violence together with Israeli reprisal raids across the "Green Line".

In May 1967 Egypt ordered out U.N. peacekeeping troops and re-militarized the Sinai peninsula, and blockaded the straits of Tiran. Fearing an Egyptian attack, the government of Levi Eshkol attempted to restrict any confrontation to Egypt alone. In particular it did whatever it could to avoid fighting Jordan. However, "carried along by a powerful current of Arab nationalism", on May 30, 1967 King Hussein flew to Egypt and signed a mutual defense treaty in which the two countries agreed to consider "any armed attack on either state or its forces as an attack on both".[17][18] On June 5, the Israel Defense Forces launched a pre-emptive attack on Egypt[19] which began what came to be known as the Six Day War.

Jordan soon began shelling targets in west Jerusalem, Netanya, and the outskirts of Tel Aviv.[20] Despite this, Israel sent a message promising not to initiate any action against Jordan if it stayed out of the war. Hussein replied that it was too late, "the die was cast".[17] On the evening of June 5 the Israeli cabinet convened to decide what to do; Yigal Allon and Menahem Begin argued that this was an opportunity to take the Old City of Jerusalem, but Eshkol decided to defer any decision until Moshe Dayan and Yitzhak Rabin could be consulted.[21] Uzi Narkis made a number of proposals for military action, including the capture of Latrun, but the cabinet turned him down. The Israeli military only commenced action after Government House was captured, which was seen as a threat to the security of Jerusalem.[22] On June 6 Dayan encircled the city, but, fearing damage to holy places and having to fight in built-up areas, he ordered his troops not to go in. However, upon hearing that the U.N. was about to declare a ceasefire, he changed his mind, and without cabinet clearance, decided to take the city.[21] After fierce fighting with Jordanian troops in and around the Jerusalem area, Israel captured the Old City on 7 June.

No specific decision had been made to capture any other territories controlled by Jordan. After the Old City was captured, Dayan told his troops to dig in to hold it. When an armored brigade commander entered the West Bank on his own initiative, and stated that he could see Jericho, Dayan ordered him back. However, when intelligence reports indicated that Hussein had withdrawn his forces across the Jordan river, Dayan ordered his troops to capture the West Bank.[22] Over the next two days, the IDF swiftly captured the rest of the West Bank and blew up the Abdullah and Hussein Bridges over the Jordan, thereby severing the West Bank from the East.[23] According to Narkis:

First, the Israeli government had no intention of capturing the West Bank. On the contrary, it was opposed to it. Second, there was not any provocation on the part of the IDF. Third, the rein was only loosened when a real threat to Jerusalem's security emerged. This is truly how things happened on June 5, although it is difficult to believe. The end result was something that no one had planned.[24]

The Arab League's Khartoum conference in September declared continuing belligerency, and stated the league's principles of "no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations with it".[25] In November 1967, UN Security Council Resolution 242 was unanimously adopted, calling for "the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East" to be achieved by "the application of both the following principles:" "Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict" (see semantic dispute) and: "Termination of all claims or states of belligerency" and respect for the right of every state in the area to live in peace within secure and recognised boundaries. Egypt, Jordan, Israel and Lebanon entered into consultations with the UN Special representative over the implementation of 242.[26] The text did not refer to the PLO or to any Palestinian representative because none was recognized at that time.

In 1988, Jordan ceded its claims to the West Bank to the Palestine Liberation Organization, as "the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people."[27][28]

Administration

Westbankjan06.jpg
Map of West Bank settlements and closures in January 2006: Yellow = Palestinian urban centers. Light pink = closed military areas or settlement boundary areas or areas isolated by the Israeli West Bank Barrier; dark pink = settlements, outposts or military bases. The black line = route of the Barrier

The 1993 Oslo Accords declared the final status of the West Bank to be subject to a forthcoming settlement between Israel and the Palestinian leadership. Following these interim accords, Israel withdrew its military rule from some parts of the West Bank, which was divided into three administrative divisions of the Oslo Accords:

Area Control Administration % of WB
land
% of WB
Palestinians
A Palestinian Palestinian 17% 55%
B Israeli Palestinian 24% 41%
C Israeli Israeli 59% 4%[29]

Area A, 2.7%, full civil control of the Palestinian Authority, comprises Palestinian towns, and some rural areas away from Israeli population centers in the north (between Jenin, Nablus, Tubas, and Tulkarm), the south (around Hebron), and one in the center south of Salfit.[30] Area B, 25.2%, adds other populated rural areas, many closer to the center of the West Bank. Area C contains all the Israeli settlements, roads used to access the settlements, buffer zones (near settlements, roads, strategic areas, and Israel), and almost all of the Jordan Valley and the Judean Desert.

Areas A and B are themselves divided among 227 separate areas (199 of which are smaller than 2 square kilometres (1 sq mi)) that are separated from one another by Israeli-controlled Area C. [31] Areas A, B, and C cross the 11 Governorates used as administrative divisions by the Palestinian National Authority, Israel, and the IDF and named after major cities.

According to Btselem, while the vast majority of the Palestinian population lives in areas A and B, the vacant land available for construction in dozens of villages and towns across the West Bank is situated on the margins of the communities and defined as area C.[32]

An assessment by the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs in 2007 found that approximately 40% of the West Bank was taken up by Israeli infrastructure. The infrastructure, consisting of settlements, the barrier, military bases and closed military areas, Israeli declared nature reserves and the roads that accompany them is off-limits or tightly controlled to Palestinians.[33]

Demographics

In December 2007, an official Census conducted by the Palestinian Authority found that the Palestinian Arab population of the West Bank (including East Jerusalem) was 2,345,000.[34][35] However, the World Bank and American-Israeli Demographic Research Group identified a 32% discrepancy between first-grade enrollment statistics documented by the Palestinian Ministry of Education and Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS)’ 2007 projections,[36] with questions also raised about the PCBS’ growth assumptions for the period 1997-2003.[37] Several media outlets have suggested that PCBS data inflate the 2007 census figures by 30%, contradicting both the Palestinian Ministry of Education's enrollment data and actual emigration growth documented by Israeli Border Police, which in 2006 observed 25,000 Palestinian Arabs emigrating from Palestinian Authority-controlled territories.[38] These data sets suggest that the Palestinian Arab population of the West Bank in 2007 was approximately 1.5 million.

There are over 350,000 Israeli settlers living in the West Bank, as well as around 210,000 living in Israeli-annexed East Jerusalem. There are also small ethnic groups, such as the Samaritans living in and around Nablus, numbering in the hundreds. Interactions between the two societies have generally declined following the Palestinian First Intifada and Second Intifada, though an economic relationship often exists between adjacent Israeli and Palestinian Arab villages.

As of October 2007, around 23,000 Palestinians in the West Bank work in Israel every day with another 9,200 working in Israeli settlements. In addition, around 10,000 Palestinian traders from the West Bank are allowed to travel every day into Israel.[39]

Approximately 30% of Palestinians living in the West Bank are refugees or descendants of refugees from villages and towns located in what became Israel during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War (see Palestinian exodus), 754,263 in June 2008 according to UNRWA statistics.[40][41][42]

Religion

Bedouin and his camel on the road to Jericho

The population of the West Bank is 75 percent Muslim while 17 percent is Jewish. The remaining 8 percent are Christians and others.[43]

Significant population centers

Significant population centers
Center Population
Al-Bireh 38,202[44]
Betar Illit 29,355
Bethlehem 25,266[44]
Gush Etzion 40,000
Hebron (al-Khalil) 163,146[44]
Jericho 18,346[44]
Jenin 39,004[44]
Ma'ale Adummim 33,259
Modi'in Illit 34,514
Nablus 126,132[44]
Qalqilyah 41,739[44]
Ramallah 27,460[44]
Tulkarm 51,300[44]
Yattah 48,672[44]

The most densely populated part of the region is a mountainous spine, running north-south, where the Palestinian cities of East Jerusalem, Nablus, Ramallah, al-Bireh, Jenin, Bethlehem, Hebron and Yattah are located as well as the Israeli settlements of Ariel, Ma'ale Adumim and Betar Illit. Ramallah, although relatively mid in population compared to other major cities as Hebron, nablus and Jenin, serves as an economic and political center for the Palestinians. Jenin in the extreme north and is the capital of north of the West Bank and is on the southern edge of the Jezreel Valley. Modi'in Illit, Qalqilyah and Tulkarm are in the low foothills adjacent to the Israeli Coastal Plain, and Jericho and Tubas are situated in the Jordan Valley, north of the Dead Sea.

Transportation and communication

Roads

Checkpoint before entering Jericho, 2005

The West Bank has 4,500 km (2,796 mi) of roads, of which 2,700 km (1,678 mi) are paved.

In response to shootings by Palestinians, some highways, especially those leading to Israeli settlements, were completely inaccessible to cars with Palestinian license plates, while many other roads were restricted only to public transportation and to Palestinians who have special permits from Israeli authorities.[45][46][47] Due to numerous shooting assaults targeting Israeli vehicles, the IDF bars Israelis from using most of the original roads in the West Bank. At certain times, Israel maintained more than 600 checkpoints or roadblocks in the region.[48] As such, movement restrictions were also placed on main roads traditionally used by Palestinians to travel between cities, and such restrictions are still blamed for poverty and economic depression in the West Bank.[49] Since the beginning of 2005, there has been some amelioration of these restrictions. According to reports, "Israel has made efforts to improve transport contiguity for Palestinians travelling in the West Bank. It has done this by constructing underpasses and bridges (28 of which have been constructed and 16 of which are planned) that link Palestinian areas separated from each other by Israeli settlements and bypass roads"[50] and by removal of checkpoints and physical obstacles, or by not reacting to Palestinian removal or natural erosion of other obstacles. "The impact (of these actions) is most felt by the easing of movement between villages and between villages and the urban centres."[50]

However, some obstacles encircling major Palestinian urban hubs, particularly Nablus and Hebron, have remained. In addition, the IDF prohibits Israeli citizens from entering Palestinian-controlled land (Area A).

As of August 2007, a divided highway is currently under construction that will pass through the West Bank. The highway has a concrete wall dividing the two sides, one designated for Israeli vehicles, the other for Palestinian. The wall is designed to allow Palestinians to pass north-south through Israeli-held land and facilitate the building of additional Jewish settlements in the Jerusalem neighborhood.[51]

Airports

The only airport in the west bank is the Atarot Airport near Ramallah, but it has been closed since 2001.

Telecom

The Palestinian Paltel telecommunication companies provide communication services in the West Bank and Gaza Strip such as landline, cellular network and Internet. Dialling code +970 is used in the West Bank and all over Palestinian territories within Palestinian Authority. The Palestinian mobile market was until 2007 monopolized by Jawwal. A new mobile operator launched in 2009 under the name of Wataniya Telecom in Palestine. The number of internet users is increasing rapidly (160,000 users in 2005)[52]

Radio and television

The Palestinian Broadcasting Corporation broadcasts from an AM station in Ramallah on 675 kHz; numerous local privately owned stations are also in operation. Most Palestinian households have a radio and TV, and satellite dishes for receiving international coverage are widespread. Recently, PalTel announced and has begun implementing an initiative to provide ADSL broadband internet service to all households and businesses. Israel's cable television company HOT, satellite television provider (DBS) Yes, AM and FM radio broadcast stations and public television broadcast stations all operate. Broadband internet service by Bezeq's ADSL and by the cable company are available as well. The Al-Aqsa Voice broadcasts from Dabas Mall in Tulkarem at 106.7 FM. The Al-Aqsa TV station shares these offices.

Higher education

An-Najah National University started as an elementary school in 1918 and became a community college in 1963. As the Jordanian government did not allow the establishment of such universities in the West Bank, Palestinians could obtain degrees only by travelling abroad to places such as Jordan, Lebanon, or Europe. After the Six-Day War, several educational institutions began offering undergraduate courses, while others opened up as entirely new universities. Seven Universities have been operating in the West Bank since 1967:

Most universities in the West Bank have politically active student bodies, and elections of student council officers are normally along party affiliations. Although the establishment of the universities was initially allowed by the Israeli authorities, some were sporadically ordered closed by the Israeli Civil Administration during the 1970s and 1980s to prevent political activities and violence against the IDF. Some universities remained closed by military order for extended periods during years immediately preceding and following the first Palestinian Intifada, but have largely remained open since the signing of the Oslo Accords despite the advent of the Al-Aqsa Intifada (Second Intifada) in 2000.

The founding of Palestinian universities has greatly increased education levels among the population in the West Bank. According to a Birzeit University study, the percentage of Palestinians choosing local universities as opposed to foreign institutions has been steadily increasing; as of 1997, 41% of Palestinians with bachelor degrees had obtained them from Palestinian institutions.[53] According to UNESCO, Palestinians are one of the most highly educated groups in the Middle East "despite often difficult circumstances".[54] The literacy rate among Palestinians in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (93,8%) is second highest in the region after Israel (97,1%).[55]

Legal status

The United Nations Security Council,[56] the United Nations General Assembly,[57] the United States,[58] the EU,[59] the International Court of Justice,[60] and the International Committee of the Red Cross[61] refer to it as Palestinian territory occupied by Israel.

According to Alan Dowty,

" ... legally the status of the West Bank falls under the international law of belligerent occupation, as distinguished from nonbelligerent occupation that follows an armistice. This assumes the possibility of renewed fighting, and affords the occupier "broad leeway". The West Bank has a unique status in two respects; first, there is no precedent for a belligerent occupation lasting for more than a brief period, and second, that the West Bank was not part of a sovereign country before occupation—thus, in legal terms, there is no "reversioner" for the West Bank. This means that sovereignty of the West Bank is currently suspended, and, according to some, Israel, as the only successor state to the Palestine Mandate, has a status that "goes beyond that of military occupier alone."[62]

The current status arises from the facts (see above reference) that Great Britain surrendered its mandate in 1948. Since the area has never in modern times been an independent state, there is no "legitimate" claimant to the area other than the present occupier, which currently happens to be Israel. This argument however is not accepted by the international community and international lawmaking bodies, virtually all of whom regard Israel's activities in the West Bank and Gaza Strip as an occupation that denies the fundamental principle of self-determination found in the Article One of the United Nations Charter, and in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Further, UN Security Council Resolution 242 notes the "inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war" regardless of whether the war in which the territory was acquired was offensive or defensive. Prominent Israeli human rights organizations such as B'tselem also refer to the Israeli control of the West Bank and Gaza Strip as an occupation.[63] John Quigley has noted that "...a state that uses force in self-defense may not retain territory it takes while repelling an attack. If Israel had acted in self-defense, that would not justify its retention of the Gaza Strip and West Bank. Under the UN Charter there can lawfully be no territorial gains from war, even by a state acting in self-defense. The response of other states to Israel's occupation shows a virtually unanimous opinion that even if Israel's action were defensive, its retention of the West Bank and Gaza Strip was not."[64]

Political positions

The future status of the West Bank, together with the Gaza Strip on the Mediterranean shore, has been the subject of negotiation between the Palestinians and Israelis, although the current Road Map for Peace, proposed by the "Quartet" comprising the United States, Russia, the European Union, and the United Nations, envisions an independent Palestinian state in these territories living side by side with Israel (see also proposals for a Palestinian state). However, the "Road Map" states that in the first phase, Palestinians must end all attacks on Israel, whereas Israel must dismantle outposts. Since neither condition has been met since the Road Map was "accepted", by all sides, final negotiations have not yet begun on major political differences.

The Palestinian Authority believes that the West Bank ought to be a part of their sovereign nation, and that the presence of Israeli military control is a violation of their right to Palestinian Authority rule. The United Nations calls the West Bank and Gaza Strip Israeli-occupied (see Israeli-occupied territories). The United States State Department also refers to the territories as occupied.[65][66][67] Many Israelis and their supporters prefer the term disputed territories, because they claim part of the territory for themselves, and state the land has not, in 2000 years, been sovereign.

Israel argues that its presence is justified because:

  1. Israel's eastern border has never been defined by anyone;
  2. The disputed territories have not been part of any state since the time of the Ottoman Empire;
  3. According to the Camp David Accords with Egypt, the 1994 agreement with Jordan and the Oslo Accords with the PLO, the final status of the territories would be fixed only when there was a permanent agreement between Israel and the Palestinians.

Palestinian public opinion opposes Israeli military and settler presence on the West Bank as a violation of their right to statehood and sovereignty.[68] Israeli opinion is split into a number of views:

Annexation

Principal geographical features of Israel and south-eastern Mediterranean region

Through the Jerusalem_Law Israel effectively, though not officially, annexed the territory of East Jerusalem, and its Palestinian residents have legal permanent residency status.[72][73] Although permanent residents are permitted, if they wish, to receive Israeli citizenship if they meet certain conditions including swearing allegiance to the State and renouncing any other citizenship (a condition of low relevancy in this case, as many of them have become nationless when Jordan relinquished its claim to the territory), most Palestinians did not apply for Israeli citizenship for political reasons.[74] There are various possible reasons as to why the West Bank had not been annexed[75] to Israel after its capture in 1967. The government of Israel has not formally confirmed an official reason, however, historians and analysts have established a variety of such, most of them demographic. Among those most commonly cited have been:

The importance of demographic concerns to some significant figures in Israel's leadership was illustrated when Avraham Burg, a former Knesset Speaker and former chair of the Jewish Agency for Israel, wrote in The Guardian in September 2003,

"Between the Jordan and the Mediterranean there is no longer a clear Jewish majority. And so, fellow citizens, it is not possible to keep the whole thing without paying a price. We cannot keep a Palestinian majority under an Israeli boot and at the same time think ourselves the only democracy in the Middle East. There cannot be democracy without equal rights for all who live here, Arab as well as Jew. We cannot keep the territories and preserve a Jewish majority in the world's only Jewish state - not by means that are humane and moral and Jewish."[79]

Settlements and international law

Israeli settlements on the West Bank beyond the Green Line border are considered by the United Nations among others to be illegal under international law.[80][81][82][83] Other legal scholars[84] including Julius Stone,[85] have argued that the settlements are legal under international law, on a number of different grounds. The Independent reported in March 2006 that immediately after the 1967 war Theodor Meron, legal counsel of Israel's Foreign Ministry advised Israeli ministers in a "top secret" memo that any policy of building settlements across occupied territories violated international law and would "contravene the explicit provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention".[86][87]

A contrasting opinion was held by Eugene Rostow, a former Dean of the Yale Law School and undersecretary of state for political affairs in the administration of U.S. President Lyndon Johnson and drafter of UN Resolution 242:

The heated question of Israel's settlements in the West Bank during the occupation period should be viewed in this perspective. The British Mandate recognized the right of the Jewish people to "close settlement" in the whole of the Mandated territory. It was provided that local conditions might require Great Britain to "postpone" or "withhold" Jewish settlement in what is now Jordan. This was done in 1922. But the Jewish right of settlement in Palestine west of the Jordan river, that is, in Israel, the West Bank, Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, was made unassailable. That right has never been terminated and cannot be terminated except by a recognized peace between Israel and its neighbors. And perhaps not even then, in view of Article 80 of the U.N. Charter, "the Palestine article", which provides that "nothing in the Charter shall be construed ... to alter in any manner the rights whatsoever of any states or any peoples or the terms of existing international instruments...."[88]

The European Union[89] and the Arab League consider the settlements to be illegal. Israel also recognizes that some small settlements are "illegal" in the sense of being in violation of Israeli law.[90][91]

In 2005 the United States ambassador to Israel, Daniel C. Kurtzer, expressed U.S. support "for the retention by Israel of major Israeli population centres [in the West Bank] as an outcome of negotiations",[92] reflecting President Bush's statement a year earlier that a permanent peace treaty would have to reflect "demographic realities" on the West Bank.[93]

The UN Security Council has issued several non-binding resolutions addressing the issue of the settlements. Typical of these is UN Security Council resolution 446 which states [the] practices of Israel in establishing settlements in the Palestinian and other Arab territories occupied since 1967 have no legal validity, and it calls on Israel as the occupying Power, to abide scrupulously by the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention.[94]

The Conference of High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention held in Geneva on 5 December 2001 called upon "the Occupying Power to fully and effectively respect the Fourth Geneva Convention in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem, and to refrain from perpetrating any violation of the Convention." The High Contracting Parties reaffirmed "the illegality of the settlements in the said territories and of the extension thereof."[95]

On December 30, 2007, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert issued an order requiring approval by both the Israeli Prime Minister and Israeli Defense Minister of all settlement activities (including planning) in the West Bank.[96]

West Bank barrier

The Israeli West Bank barrier is a physical barrier ordered for construction by the Israeli Government, consisting of a network of fences with vehicle-barrier trenches surrounded by an on average 60 metres (197 ft) wide exclusion area (90%) and up to 8 metres (26 ft) high concrete walls (10%) (although in most areas the wall is not nearly that high).[97] It is located mainly within the West Bank, partly along the 1949 Armistice line, or "Green Line" between the West Bank and Israel. As of April 2006 the length of the barrier as approved by the Israeli government is 703 kilometers (436 miles) long. Approximately 58.4% has been constructed, 8.96% is under construction, and construction has not yet begun on 33% of the barrier.[98] The space between the barrier and the green line is a closed military zone known as the Seam Zone, cutting off 8.5% of the West Bank and encompassing tens of villages and tens of thousands of Palestinians.[99][100][101]

The barrier generally runs along or near the 1949 Jordanian-Israeli armistice/Green Line, but diverges in many places to include on the Israeli side several of the highly populated areas of Jewish settlements in the West Bank such as East Jerusalem, Ariel, Gush Etzion, Immanuel, Karnei Shomron, Givat Ze'ev, Oranit, and Maale Adumim.

The barrier is a very controversial project. Supporters claim the barrier is a necessary tool protecting Israeli civilians from the Palestinian attacks that increased significantly during the Al-Aqsa Intifada;[102][103] it has helped reduce incidents of terrorism by 90% from 2002 to 2005; over a 96% reduction in terror attacks in the six years ending in 2007,[104] though Israel's State Comptroller has acknowledged that most of the suicide bombers crossed into Israel through existing checkpoints [11]. Its supporters claim that the onus is now on the Palestinian Authority to fight terrorism.[105]

Opponents claim the barrier is an illegal attempt to annex Palestinian land under the guise of security,[106] violates international law,[107] has the intent or effect to pre-empt final status negotiations,[108] and severely restricts Palestinians who live nearby, particularly their ability to travel freely within the West Bank and to access work in Israel, thereby undermining their economy.[109] According to a 2007 World Bank report, the Israeli occupation of the West Bank has destroyed the Palestinian economy, in violation of the 2005 Agreement on Movement and Access. All major roads (with a total length of 700 km) are basically off-limits to Palestinians, making it impossible to do normal business. Economic recovery would reduce Palestinian dependence on international aid by one billion dollars per year.[110]

Pro-settler opponents claim that the barrier is a sly attempt to artificially create a border that excludes the settlers, creating "facts on the ground" that justify the mass dismantlement of hundreds of settlements and displacement of over 100,000 Jews from the land they claim as their biblical homeland.[111]

See also

References

  1. Dishon (1973) Dishon Record 1968 Published by Shiloah Institute (later the Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies) and John Wiley and Sons, ISBN 0-470-21611-5 p 441
  2. See, for example, the correspondence between the Israeli PM, Menachem Begin, and US President Jimmy Carter in September 1978: "In each paragraph in which the expression "West Bank" appears it is being, and will be, understood by the Government of Israel as Judea and Samaria."[1]
  3. The World Factbook - Field Listing :: Coastline, Central Intelligence Agency
  4. Israel, the Hashemites, and the Palestinians: the fateful triangle By Efraim Karsh, P. R. Kumaraswamy, pg. 196
  5. The Palestine Yearbook of International Law 1987-1988 Pineschi, Anis F. Kassim, 1988. page 247
  6. United States Department of State / Foreign relations of the United States, 1950. The Near East, South Asia, and Africa pg. 921
  7. Joseph Massad said that the members of the Arab League granted de facto recognition and that the United States had formally recognized the annexation, except for Jerusalem. See Joseph A. Massad, Colonial Effects: The Making of National Identity in Jordan (New York: Columbia University Press, 2001),ISBN 0-231-12323-X, page 229
  8. 8.0 8.1 It is often stated that Pakistan recognized it as well, but that seems to be untrue; see S. R. Silverburg, Pakistan and the West Bank: A research note, Middle Eastern Studies, 19:2 (1983) 261-263.
  9. The Illegal-Settlements Myth, Commentary, December 2009
  10. Independent law report commissioned by the BBC Board of Governors, BBC Governors’ Archive, February 2006
  11. Anger at Israeli settlement plan, BBC, 7 September 2009
  12. See Geography of the West Bank.
  13. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/we.html
  14. The Palestine Mandate
  15. "United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181". United Nations. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/res181.asp. Retrieved 2009-12-27. 
  16. Armstrong, Karen. Jerusalem: One City, Three Faiths. New York: Ballantine Books, 1996. p. 387.
  17. 17.0 17.1 "In May-June 1967 Eshkol's government did everything in its power to confine the confrontation to the Egyptian front. Eshkol and his colleagues took into account the possibility of some fighting on the Syrian front. But they wanted to avoid having a clash with Jordan and the inevitable complications of having to deal with the predominantly Non-Jewish Arab population of the West Bank. The fighting on the eastern front was initiated by Jordan, not by Israel. King Hussein got carried along by a powerful current of Arab nationalism. On 30 May he flew to Cairo and signed a defense pact with Nasser. On 5 June, Jordan started shelling the Israeli side in Jerusalem. This could have been interpreted either as a salvo to uphold Jordanian honor or as a declaration of war. Eshkol decided to give King Hussein the benefit of the doubt. Through General Odd Bull, the Norwegian commander of UNTSO, he sent the following message the morning of 5 June: 'We shall not initiate any action whatsoever against Jordan. However, should Jordan open hostilities, we shall react with all our might, and the king will have to bear the full responsibility of the consequences.' King Hussein told General Bull that it was too late; the die was cast." Avi Shlaim, The Iron Wall: Israel and the Arab World, W. W. Norton & Company, 2000, pp. 243–244.
  18. Michael Oren, Six Days of War, Oxford University Press, 2002, ISBN 0-19-515174-7, p. 130
  19. Pre-emptive strike:
    • "In a pre-emptive attack on Egypt ..." Israel and the Palestinians in depth, 1967: Six Day War, BBC website. URL accessed May 14, 2006.
    • "a massive pre-emptive strike on Egypt." BBC on this day, BBC website. URL accessed May 14, 2006.
    • "Israel launched a pre-emptive strike on June 5" Mideast 101: The Six Day War, CNN website. URL accessed May 14, 2006.
    • "Most historians now agree that although Israel struck first, this pre-emptive strike was defensive in nature." The Mideast: A Century of Conflict Part 4: The 1967 Six Day War, NPR morning edition, October 3, 2002. URL accessed May 14, 2006.
    • "a massive preemptive strike by Israel that crippled the Arabs’ air capacity." SIX-DAY WAR, Funk & Wagnalls New Encyclopedia. © 2006 World Almanac Education Group via The History Channel website, 2006, URL accessed February 17, 2007.
    • "In a pre-emptive strike, Israel smashed its enemies’ forces in just six days ..." Country Briefings: Israel, The Economist website, Jul 28th 2005. URL accessed March 15, 2007.
    • "Yet pre-emptive strikes can often be justified even if they don't meet the letter of the law. At the start of the Six-Day War in 1967, Israel, fearing that Egypt was aiming to destroy the Jewish state, devastated Egypt's air force before its pilots had scrambled their jets." Strike First, Explain Yourself Later Michael Elliott, Time, Jul. 01, 2002. URL accessed March 15, 2007.
    • "the situation was similar to the crisis that preceded the 1967 Six Day war, when Israel took preemptive military action." Delay with Diplomacy, Marguerite Johnson, Time, May 18, 1981. URL accessed March 15, 2007.
    • "Israel made a preemptive attack against a threatened Arab invasion ..." Six-Day War, Encarta Answers, URL accessed April 10, 2007.
    • "Israel preempted the invasion with its own attack on June 5, 1967." Six-Day War, Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia 2007. URL accessed April 10, 2007.
    Following Egyptian actions:
    • "In 1967, Egypt ordered the UN troops out and blocked Israeli shipping routes - adding to already high levels of tension between Israel and its neighbours." Israel and the Palestinians in depth, 1967: Six Day War, BBC website. URL accessed May 14, 2006.
    • "In June 1967, Egypt, Syria and Jordan massed their troops on Israel's borders in preparation for an all-out attack." Mideast 101: The Six Day War, CNN website. URL accessed May 14, 2006.
    • "Nasser ... closed the Gulf of Aqaba to shipping, cutting off Israel from its primary oil supplies. He told U.N. peacekeepers in the Sinai Peninsula to leave. He then sent scores of tanks and hundreds of troops into the Sinai closer to Israel. The Arab world was delirious with support", The Mideast: A Century of Conflict Part 4: The 1967 Six Day War, NPR morning edition, October 3, 2002. URL accessed May 14, 2006.
    • "War returned in 1967, when Egypt, Syria and Jordan massed forces to challenge Israel." Country Briefings: Israel, The Economist website. URL accessed March 3, 2007.
    • "After Israel declared its statehood, several Arab states and Palestinian groups immediately attacked Israel, only to be driven back. In 1956 Israel overran Egypt in the Suez-Sinai War. Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser vowed to avenge Arab losses and press the cause of Palestinian nationalism. To this end, he organized an alliance of Arab states surrounding Israel and mobilized for war." Six-Day War, Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclopedia 2007. URL accessed April 10, 2007.
  20. "On 5 June, Israel sent a message to Hussein urging him not to open fire. Despite shelling into western Jerusalem, Netanya, and the outskirts of Tel Aviv, Israel did nothing." The Six Day War and Its Enduring Legacy, Washington Institute for Near East Policy, July 2, 2002.
  21. 21.0 21.1 Shlaim, 2000, p. 244.
  22. 22.0 22.1 Shlaim, 2000, p. 245.
  23. Benny Morris, Righteous Victims, pp. 324–5
  24. Shlaim, 2000, p. 246.
  25. League of Arab States, Khartoum Resolution, 1 September 1967
  26. "See Security Council Document S/10070 Para 2.".
  27. "Address to the Nation". Kinghussein.gov.jo. http://www.kinghussein.gov.jo/88_july31.html. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  28. "West Bank – MSN Encarta". Encarta.msn.com. http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761557747_2/West_Bank.html. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  29. "JURIST - Palestinian Authority: Palestinian law, legal research, human rights". Jurist.law.pitt.edu. http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/World/palest.htm. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  30. Gvirtzman, Haim (February 08, 1998). "Maps of Israeli Interests in Judea and Samaria Determining the Extent of the Additional Withdrawals". http://www.biu.ac.il/Besa/books/maps.htm. Retrieved 2008-09-01. 
  31. "The West Bank and Gaza: A Population Profile - Population Reference Bureau". Prb.org. http://www.prb.org/Articles/2002/TheWestBankandGazaAPopulationProfile.aspx. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  32. "B'Tselem - Publications - Land Grab: Israel's Settlement Policy in the West Bank, May 2002". Btselem.org. http://www.btselem.org/English/Publications/Summaries/200205_Land_Grab.asp. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  33. "The Humanitarian Impact on Palestinians of Israeli Settlements and Other Infrastructure in the West Bank" (PDF). UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs – Occupied Palestinian Territory. http://www.ochaopt.org/documents/TheHumanitarianImpactOfIsraeliInfrastructureTheWestBank_full.pdf. Retrieved 2009-04-09. 
  34. "Palestinians grow by a million in decade". The Jerusalem Post. February 9, 2008. http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull&cid=1202246355071. Retrieved 2008-10-08. 
  35. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/we.html#People CIA Factbook| West Bank| People
  36. THE PALESTINIAN CENSUS - SMOKE & MIRRORS, Independent Media Review Analysis, February 11, 2008
  37. The Million Person Gap: The Arab Population in the West Bank and Gaza, Mideast Security and Policy Studies No. 65, February 2006
  38. President Clinton, you’re wrong!, Ynetnews, November 20, 2009
  39. Israel labour laws apply to Palestinian workers
  40. "UNRWA in Figures: Figures as of 31 December 2004" (PDF). United Nations. April 2005. http://www.un.org/unrwa/publications/pdf/uif-dec04.pdf. Retrieved 2006-09-27. 
  41. "Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics". Palestinian National Authority Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics. 2007. http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/. Retrieved 2006-09-27. 
  42. Ksenia Svetlova (December 1, 2005). "Can trust be rebuilt?". The Jerusalem Post. http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?apage=2&cid=1132475665870&pagename=JPost%2FJPArticle%2FShowFull. Retrieved 2006-09-27. 
  43. CIA - The World Factbook - West Bank
  44. 44.0 44.1 44.2 44.3 44.4 44.5 44.6 44.7 44.8 44.9 2007 Locality Population Statistics. Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics (PCBS).
  45. http://www.humanitarianinfo.org/opt/docs/UN/OCHA/OCHAoPt_ClosureAnalysis0106_En.pdf
  46. "A/57/366/Add.1 of 16 September 2002". Domino.un.org. http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/a39191b210be1d6085256da90053dee5/43fc268b1bf484fd85256c610065c63a!OpenDocument. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  47. YESHA. "A/57/366 of 29 August 2002". Domino.un.org. http://domino.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/5ba47a5c6cef541b802563e000493b8c/5189f43f72a68a2785256c61005a58ea!OpenDocument. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  48. "60 Minutes | Middle East | Time Running Out For A Two-State Solution?". http://www.cbsnews.com.+25 January 2009. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/01/23/60minutes/main4749723.shtml. Retrieved 2009-01-29. 
  49. http://www.reliefweb.int/library/documents/2005/ocha-opt-26apr.pdf
  50. 50.0 50.1 http://www.humanitarianinfo.org/opt/docs/UN/OCHA/ochaHU0805_En.pdf
  51. Erlanger, Steven. A Segregated Road in an Already Divided Land, The New York Times, (2007-08-11). Retrieved on 2007-08-11.
  52. http://www.internetworldstats.com/me/ps.htm
  53. "chapter 4??" (PDF). http://home.birzeit.edu/dsp/research/publications/2002/49e.pdf. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  54. "UNESCO | Education - Palestinian Authority". Portal.unesco.org. http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.php-URL_ID=17238&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  55. http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2009_EN_Indicators.pdf
  56. Resolution 446, Resolution 465, Resolution 484, among others
  57. "Applicability of the Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War, of 12 August 1949, to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including Jerusalem, and the other occupied Arab territories". United Nations. December 17, 2003. http://domino.un.org/unispal.nsf/97360ee7a29e68a085256df900723485/d6f5d7049734efff85256e1200677754. Retrieved 2006-09-27. 
  58. http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2001/nea/8262.htm
  59. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/2004/12/22/%7B3FA161D9-6DA6-408F-85CE-20D0EC68DDFF%7D.pdf
  60. "Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory". International Court of Justice. July 9, 2004. http://domino.un.org/UNISPAl.NSF/85255e950050831085255e95004fa9c3/3740e39487a5428a85256ecc005e157a. Retrieved 2006-09-27. 
  61. "Conference of High Contracting Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention: statement by the International Committee of the Red Cross". International Committee of the Red Cross. December 5, 2001. http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/iwpList247/D86C9E662022D64E41256C6800366D55#2. Retrieved 2006-09-27. 
  62. Dowty, 2001, p. 217.
  63. "B'Tselem - Land Expropriation and Settlements in the International Law". Btselem.org. http://www.btselem.org/english/Settlements/International_Law.asp. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  64. Quigley, The Case for Palestine, 2005, p. 172
  65. "Jordan (03/08)". State.gov. http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3464.htm. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  66. "Israel". State.gov. http://www.state.gov/t/pm/64711.htm. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  67. "Israel and the Occupied Territories". State.gov. http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2007/90212.htm#OT. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  68. "PSR Survey". http://www.pcpsr.org/survey/polls/2001/p2a.html. Retrieved 2007-04-16. 
  69. "Israeli public opinion regarding the conflict". The Center for Middle East Peace and Economics Cooperation. http://www.mifkad.org.il/en/more.asp. Retrieved 2006-09-27. 
  70. Asher Arian (June 2002). "A Further Turn to the Right: Israeli Public Opinion on National Security - 2002". Strategic Assessment (Tel Aviv University: Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies) 5 (1): 50–57. http://www.tau.ac.il/jcss/sa/v5n1p4Ari.html. Retrieved 2006-09-27. 
  71. Aaron Klein (February 24, 2005). "Suppressed poll released following WND story: Results show plurality of Israelis favor booting Palestinians". WorldNetDaily. http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42855. Retrieved 2006-09-27. 
  72. Yael Stein (April 1997). "The Quiet Deportation: Revocation of Residency of East Jerusalem Palestinians" (Nuvola-inspired File Icons for MediaWiki-fileicon-doc.pngDOC). Joint report by Hamoked and B'Tselem. http://www.btselem.org/Download/199704_Quiet_Deportation_Eng.doc. Retrieved 2006-09-27. 
  73. Yael Stein (April 1997). "The Quiet Deportation: Revocation of Residency of East Jerusalem Palestinians (Summary)". Joint report by Hamoked and B'Tselem. http://www.btselem.org/English/Publications/Summaries/199704_Quiet_Deportation.asp. Retrieved 2006-09-27. 
  74. "Legal status of East Jerusalem and its residents". B'Tselem. http://www.btselem.org/english/Jerusalem/Legal_Status.asp. Retrieved 2006-09-27. 
  75. 75.0 75.1 (Bard"Our Positions: Solving the Palestinian/Israeli Conflict". Free Muslim Coalition Against Terrorism. http://www.freemuslims.org/issues/israel-palestine.php. Retrieved 2006-09-27. 
  76. 76.0 76.1 76.2 Bard
  77. 77.0 77.1 David Bamberger (1985, 1994). A Young Person's History of Israel. USA: Behrman House. pp. 128. ISBN 0-87441-393-1. 
  78. http://www.jta.org/news/article/2010/07/22/2740184/carter-center-calls-for-end-to-east-jerusalem-deportations
  79. [2] Avraham Burg, "The end of Zionism", The Guardian, September 15, 2003, accessed September 8, 2009
  80. Emma Playfair (Ed.) (1992). International Law and the Administration of Occupied Territories. USA: Oxford University Press. pp. 396. ISBN 0-19-825297-8. 
  81. Cecilia Albin (2001). Justice and Fairness in International Negotiation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 150. ISBN 0-521-79725-X. 
  82. Mark Gibney; Stanlislaw Frankowski (1999). Judicial Protection of Human Rights: Myth or Reality?. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger/Greenwood. pp. 72. ISBN 0-275-96011-0. 
  83. 'Plia Albeck, legal adviser to the Israeli Government was born in 1937. She died on September 27, 2005, aged 68', The Times, October 5, 2005, p. 71.
  84. "FAQ on Israeli settlements". CBC News. February 26, 2004. http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/middleeast/settlements.html. Retrieved 2006-09-27. 
  85. "International Law" (PDF). http://www.aijac.org.au/resources/reports/international_law.pdf. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  86. Donald Macintyre, 'Israelis were warned on illegality of settlements in 1967 memo', The Independent (London), March 11, 2006, p. 27.
  87. "Israelis Were Warned on Illegality of Settlements in 1967 Memo". Commondreams.org. http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0311-06.htm. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  88. "Resolved: are the settlements legal? Israeli West Bank policies". Tzemachdovid.org. http://www.tzemachdovid.org/Facts/islegal1.shtml. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  89. [3] EU Committee Report. Retrieved April 19, 2007
  90. Diplomatic and Legal Aspects of the Settlement Issue, Jerusalem Issue Brief, Vol. 2, No. 16, 19 January 2003.
  91. How to Respond to Common Misstatements About Israel: Israeli Settlements, Anti-Defamation League website. URL accessed April 10, 2006.
  92. 'US will accept Israel settlements', BBC News Online, 25 March 2005.
  93. 'UN Condemns Israeli settlements', BBC News Online, 14 April 2005.
  94. UNSC Resolution 446 (1979) of 22 March 1979
  95. Implementation of the Fourth Geneva Convention in the occupied Palestinian territories: history of a multilateral process (1997–2001), International Review of the Red Cross, 2002 – No. 847.
  96. Entous, Adam (2007-12-31). "Olmert curbs WBank building, expansion and planning". Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSL31349948. Retrieved 2007-12-31. 
  97. Israel High Court Ruling Docket H.C.J. 7957/04
  98. "B'Tselem - The Separation Barrier - Statistics". Btselem.org. http://www.btselem.org/english/Separation_Barrier/Statistics.asp. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  99. "Separation Barrier: 9 July 2006: Two Years after the ICJ's Decision on the Separation Barrier". B'tselem. 9 July 2006. http://www.btselem.org/english/separation_barrier/20060709_Hague_2nd_anniversary.asp. Retrieved 2007-05-11. 
  100. Margarat Evans (2006-01-06). "Indepth Middle East:Israel's Barrier". CBC. http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/middleeast/israel_barrier.html. Retrieved 2007-11-05. 
  101. "Israel's Separation Barrier:Challenges to the Rule of Law and Human Rights: Executive Summary Part I and II". International Commission of Jurists. 6 July 2004. http://www.icj.org/news.php3?id_article=3410&lang=en&print=true. Retrieved 2007-05-11. 
  102. "Israel Security Fence - Ministry of Defense". Securityfence.mod.gov.il. http://www.securityfence.mod.gov.il/Pages/ENG/questions.htm. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 
  103. Map of Palestine - Land of Israel, 1845
  104. Wall Street Journal, "After Sharon", January 6, 2006.
  105. Sen. Clinton: I support W. Bank fence, PA must fight terrorism
  106. Under the Guise of Security, B'Tselem
  107. "U.N. court rules West Bank barrier illegal" (CNN)
  108. Set in stone, The Guardian, June 15, 2003
  109. The West Bank Wall - Unmaking Palestine
  110. Movement and access restrictions in the West Bank: Uncertainty and inefficiency in the Palestinian economy. World Bank Technical Team. May 9, 2007.
  111. "Women in Green - What We Say". Womeningreen.org. http://www.womeningreen.org/sayjune02.htm. Retrieved 2008-10-09. 

Bibliography

External links